Tag Archives: human-rights

World AIDS Day & Anger

World AIDS Day began in 1988, when an international meeting of health ministers in London, England declared December 1st a day to highlight the enormity of the AIDS pandemic. Today in Canada, men who have sex with men* still make up the majority of new HIV infections annually: 57% or about 1400 new infections/year. Men who have sex with men are 131 times more likely to get HIV than men who do not. Pause to consider that.

screen-shot-2016-12-01-at-12-44-46-pm

The world is an angry place today. Foreign national events such as Brexit and the U.S. Election were notable in their antagonistic rhetoric. But even at the most local level, Calgarians are bellicose over reasonably low stake issues such as cycle tracks, public art, and election line-ups (issues I am personally connected to, which have given me lots of practice with wrath management technique).

Recently, I came upon a manifesto in zine form called Queers Read This. It was distributed at the June 1990 Pride March in New York City, and “published anonymously by queers.” It is a concentrated distillation of rage at a time when the stakes could not have been higher. AIDS, at the time, was a growing epidemic and for most, an almost certain death sentence.

The publication has exhortations to “bash back,” meet hatred with hatred, and give no inch to straights. It very much defended the word Queer as a militant signifier of strength which galvanized and branded the generation of activists who came of age then.

Calgary was part of this movement. 1990 was the year of the first Pride Rally in the city. It was also a time of tragic AIDS deaths, frequent gay bashings and other forms of homophobic backlash. Yet it was this anger which helped us stand our ground and ultimately win our human rights battles.

So I am reframing my relationship to anger. Anger can affect social change. Anger can be something positive – like the 1400 Canadian men who have sex with men who will get infected with HIV this year.

*{Men who have sex with men is a term that refers to behaviour rather than identity; it captures not only gay and bisexual men but also those who do not identify themselves based on their sexual practices.}

ANGER (An Essay from Queers Read This)

“The strong sisters told the brothers that there were two important things to remember about the coming revolutions, the first is that we will get our asses kicked. The second, is that we will win.”

I’m angry. I’m angry for being condemned to death by strangers saying, “You deserve to die” and “AIDS is the cure.” Fury erupts when a Republican woman wearing thousands of dollars of garments and jewelry minces by the police lines shaking her head, chuckling and wagging her finger at us like we are recalcitrant children making absurd demands and throwing a temper tantrum when they aren’t met. Angry while Joseph agonizes over $8,000 for AZT which might keep him alive a little longer and which makes him sicker than the disease he is diagnosed with. Angry as I listen to a man tell me that after changing his will five times he’s running out of people to leave things to. All of his best friends are dead. Angry when I stand in a sea of quilt panels, or go to a candlelight march or attend yet another memorial service. I will not march silently with a fucking candle and I want to take that goddamned quilt and wrap myself in it and furiously rend it and my hair and curse every god religion ever created. I refuse to accept a creation that cuts people down in the third decade of their life.

It is cruel and vile and meaningless and everything I have in me rails against the absurdity and I raise my face to the clouds and a ragged laugh that sounds more demonic than joyous erupts from my throat and tears stream down my face and if this disease doesn’t kill me, I may just die of frustration. My feet pound the streets and Peter’s hands are chained to a pharmaceutical company’s reception desk while the receptionist looks on in horror and Eric’s body lies rotting in a Brooklyn cemetery and I’ll never hear his flute resounding off the walls of the meeting house again. And I see the old people in Tompkins Square Park huddled in their long wool coats in June to keep out the cold they perceive is there and to cling to whatever little life has left to offer them. I’m reminded of the people who strip and stand before a mirror each night before they go to bed and search their bodies for any mark that might not have been there yesterday. A mark that this scourge has visited them.

And I’m angry when the newspapers call us “victims” and sound alarms that “it” might soon spread to the “general population.” And I want to scream “Who the fuck am I?” And I want to scream at New York Hospital with its yellow plastic bags marked “isolation linen”, “ropa infecciosa” and its orderlies in latex gloves and surgical masks skirting the bed as if its occupant will suddenly leap out and douse them with blood and semen giving them too the plague.

And I’m angry at straight people who sit smugly wrapped in their self-protective coat of monogamy and heterosexuality confident that this disease has nothing to do with them because “it” only happens to “them.” And the teenage boys who upon spotting my Silence=Death button begin chanting “Faggot’s gonna die” and I wonder, who taught them this? Enveloped in fury and fear, I remain silent while my button mocks me every step of the way.

And the anger I feel when a television program on the quilt gives profiles of the dead and the list begins with a baby, a teenage girl who got a blood transfusion, an elderly baptist minister and his wife and when they finally show a gay man, he’s described as someone who knowingly infected teenage male prostitutes with the virus. What else can you expect from a faggot?

I’m angry.

screen-shot-2016-12-01-at-12-38-50-pm

Photo: Queers Read This published anonymously by queers.

{KA}

 

 

Corporate Calgary & Gay Rights

Back in the early 90s, I was a volunteer writer at CLUE! Magazine. One of the most challenging articles I wrote was: Private sector takes lead with same-sex spousal benefits (January 1995). The reason – I had to cold call more than a dozen of Calgary’s largest companies and ask them about their HR policies: were they gay friendly, and how did they accommodate their LGBTQ employees?

jan-95-clue

CLUE! Magazine January 1995

I remember that several HR managers were surprised by the question, and some companies registered no comment. It felt a little bit like journalism activism. Some companies were interested in discussing the idea, having never really considered it before, and others were proud to say they already offered same-sex benefits despite complications with the Federal Income Tax Act and Provincial employment legislation.

Nova Corporation led the way here in 1990, and a handful of other Calgary companies had followed their lead by 1995. It was interesting to note that even if same-sex benefits were offered, often very few employees would claim them.

The issue was a high-profile one due to Ontario’s Bill 167, the Equality Rights Statute Law Amendment Act, defeated narrowly in the summer of 1994.  Bill 167 promised to revamp adoption right, spousal employment benefits, property rights and survivor pensions for LGBTQ couples, and received national attention.

A June 1994 Angus Reid poll showed that 54% of Canadians opposed the bill – 64% in Ontario – although it was determined that the adoption rights portion of the bill was more frowned upon then same-sex employee benefits.

Corporate culture however was in turmoil, independent of public discourse, with activist gay employees taking their employers to task.  At Imperial Oil, a gay chemical engineer named David Mitges, who had been working for the company since 1980, started attending his company’s annual shareholders meeting in 1993.  For eight sequential years he asked Imperial to offer same-sex benefits, despite the booing and harassment from the audience present.  The national press described Mitges’ protracted tussle as “David vs. the Energy Goliath.”  In 2000, Imperial capitulated and began offering same-sex benefits, which by that time had become more normative in corporate culture.

Coming full circle this week, the Pride Employee network of Imperial, invited The Calgary Gay History Project to their corporate headquarters to talk about the city’s gay history. About 40 employees came to a lunch-hour presentation at which the company’s management concluded with their expressed commitment to diversity at Imperial.

screen-shot-2016-11-03-at-11-47-11-am

Greg Cashin and Lisa Fahey of Imperial’s Pride Employee Network with Calgary Gay History Project’s Kevin Allen (centre).

{KA}

 

 

Gay Age of Consent in Canada

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau this fall contemplates lowering the age of consent for anal sex (read: gay sex) from 18 to 16, matching that of heterosexuals, it is timely to reflect on where we have come from, to get here.

Calgarian, Everett Klippert‘s sensational Supreme Court case in 1967, paved the way for decriminalizing homosexuality for two consenting adults aged 21 years or older. The law came into effect in the summer of 1969.

On January 15th, 1981 the Calgary Herald reported on then Federal Justice Minister Jean Chretien’s bill to reduce the age of consent for homosexual acts from 21 to 18, as well as make legal “daisy chain”sex, or sex with more than one consenting adult.

screen-shot-2016-09-14-at-10-14-43-pm

February 1981 Issue: Legal at 18? Cover Story

The Body Politic, Canada’s gay liberation newspaper soon cheekily reported: “Gay sex, orgies to be legal at 18 if Criminal Code changes pass.” Unfortunately the Bill never makes it through and was withdrawn by Chretien in 1982 due to organized pressure from police chiefs, social conservatives and an organized letter writing campaign from the 10,000-member strong, US-based, Family and Freedom Foundation.

The age of consent for gay sex was eventually dropped to 18 in 1987, and came into effect in 1988 as did sex with more than one consenting adult (not in public). Several legal minds noted that the difference in ages of consent between anal and vaginal sex (then aged 14) was discriminatory. The Justice Minister at the time, Raymond Hnatyshyn, argued AIDS prevention was one of the justifications for the age difference in consent.

In 1995, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a lower court ruling that Canada’s higher age of consent for anal sex unconstitutionally discriminated against gay men and violated the Canadian Charter of Rights. Quebec, then Alberta, then BC, then Nova Scotia courts made similar rulings; the Federal Government contemplated appealing those decisions but never did. Consequently, although it is a theoretical crime for two 17-year olds to engage in anal sex, law enforcement currently chooses not to police it.

Trudeau’s lowering the age of consent for gay sex is part of a larger apology to the LGBTQ community for historic wrongs that Canada’s state institutions inflicted upon us in previous decades. It also aligns the Federal criminal code with the Provincial Court rulings of the past 20 years. Although changing the law to match the enforcement does not seem very dramatic, a new generation of social conservatives are sounding the alarm and using an old trope – gay panic  – as a fundraising tool.

trudeau-lowering-the-consent-of-anal-sex1

A reworked Pride Toronto Promo Image of the Prime Minister on the evangelical website Canadianvalues.ca {they also oppose Trans public washroom usage!}

Decidedly not panicked here, we at the Calgary Gay History Project are looking forward to the changes.

age-of-consent

The UK also had issues around double standards in the 1980s….

{KA}